Viviane3 hours ago
im not talking about the cults, just the books. I've said this I don't know how many times.The books are about a middle eastern death cult that has evolved into a global death cult. They are inseparable. Saying over and over they are not the same doesn't make it true.
Man this thread...
So the problem with this statement, and I know that you know history because you've elsewhere proven you are familiar with it, is that the books came first. The cults were a later development, the sects were a later development - and these formed because of one man or a small group convincing other followers of the books that they meant something or were saying something that is absolutely insane. Upon this reasoning the, as you are calling them, "death cults" formed. But the fact is that not everyone draws the same conclusion from the books as these radical Muslims or the extreme Christians. You surely must know this, and the fact being true shows that (while the books could use some updated jargon and culture) the problem has never been the books. The books didn't direct these people to do insane things, the people reached these conclusions all on their own and of their own reasoning and efforts.
For this reason, they are separate because the fact that there are a vast majority of followers of these books that don't agree with the crazy people shows the book is not the issue.